Yet I’m not angry at Trump; I expect him to be repugnant. I am angry at Clinton, because she followed up her convention with another unnecessary lie; another excuse for people to distrust her; another thin reed upon which undecided voters could justify a belated allegiance to a man who former New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg called “a dangerous demagogue.”
Why would she deny the facts of what she just went through? Something so easily fact-checkable, so recent on everyone’s mind? This election is hers to lose, so why is she trying so hard?